Name a pro player in any sport....

[MIAMIDOMINATION]

Luck will be better than Manning..I know it's a reach...but got that feeling

Brady over Drew Bleedslow may qualify

This is tough though...

Bledsoe is not a Hall of Famer. I doubt Luck can match Manning statically. He better start winning some Super Bowls then. Manning is just a season away from being the All-Time Leader in all important statistical passing categories.

Not a hall of famer but he is arguably a patriots legend

He was very good for a very long time

[Y4NK33 PL4N3T]

Luck will be better than Manning..I know it's a reach...but got that feeling

Brady over Drew Bleedslow may qualify

This is tough though...

Bledsoe is not a Hall of Famer. I doubt Luck can match Manning statically. He better start winning some Super Bowls then. Manning is just a season away from being the All-Time Leader in all important statistical passing categories.

Not a hall of famer but he is arguably a patriots legend

He was very good for a very long time

Agreed.

Doesn't have to be HOF.

[SmithsAUFan]

Carl Yastrzemski was statistically better in some categories to Ted Williams but if Ted Williams played the years that he missed baseball for the wars then it would be nullified. Carl finished with about 800 more hits. Both have triple crowns and MVPs. Ted Williams beats him on that. Carl had more tools as a baseball player because he was faster and was better in the field.

[Y4NK33 PL4N3T]

Carl Yastrzemski was statistically better in some categories to Ted Williams but if Ted Williams played the years that he missed baseball for the wars then it would be nullified. Carl finished with about 800 more hits. Both have triple crowns and MVPs. Ted Williams beats him on that. Carl had more tools as a baseball player because he was faster and was better in the field.

Pretty good one. I'll call that a push!

[ericberry14]

You guys are legit stoopid and bad trolls

[Y4NK33 PL4N3T]

Fuck your mother

You are out of your mind

You guys are legit stoopid and bad trolls

Fantastic contributions as always. :clap

[Muck FcDisney]

:delivers the :eb

If we're doing coaches Fisher could end up > Bowden, but it's way too early to tell, and I highly doubt he stays around for another 25+ years.

[MIAMIDOMINATION]

Carl Yastrzemski was statistically better in some categories to Ted Williamsbut if Ted Williams played the years that he missed baseball for the wars then it would be nullified. Carl finished with about 800 more hits. Both have triple crowns and MVPs. Ted Williams beats him on that. Carl had more tools as a baseball player because he was faster and was better in the field.

blasphemy

[Y4NK33 PL4N3T]

He said 'some categories'.

[ericberry14]

Fuck your mother

You are out of your mind

You guys are legit stoopid and bad trolls

Fantastic contributions as always. :clap

Andrew luck will not be better than manning. The rest was in response to obvious trolls


Sorry if that upsets you. I can't really add anything because it is hard as fuck. Who is s legend. Who replaced them and did better? I don't even know that Aaron Rogers is better than favre . It is hard to say. And I wouldn't say Peyton replaced elway because he didn't....

[Carr2Cooper]

Tim Brown took over for James Lofton in 88...both are HoF now

[MIAMIDOMINATION]

He said 'some categories'.

well they sure as hell arent batting average home runs or rbis :lol:

[JdPat04]

Joe Torre replaced Bobby Cox once as a manager for the Braves. Both went on to become Hall of Famers. Torre exceeding Bobby's initial stint as Braves manager. Bobby's second stint was what got him into the Hall of Fame. Torre's stint as a Yankee manager was really what got him into the Hall of Fame though.

If we are going coaches thats kind of easier actually

Bill Parcells was replaced by Pete Carroll who was replaced by Bill Belichick

That ends up being a three peat. Because Carroll may go down better than Parcells, and Belichick will go down better than both

I call no on this one.

Pete doesn't count as a good coach until USC and Seattle

[Y4NK33 PL4N3T]

He said 'some categories'.

well they sure as hell arent batting average home runs or rbis :lol:

Yaz has more RBI than Williams, it's a push though.

[SmithsAUFan]

Carl Yastrzemski was statistically better in some categories to Ted Williamsbut if Ted Williams played the years that he missed baseball for the wars then it would be nullified. Carl finished with about 800 more hits. Both have triple crowns and MVPs. Ted Williams beats him on that. Carl had more tools as a baseball player because he was faster and was better in the field.

blasphemy

Two different players. Ted was a pure hitter and Carl was actually more polished in other facets in the game. Carl had more tools than Ted had.

[MIAMIDOMINATION]

He said 'some categories'.

well they sure as hell arent batting average home runs or rbis :lol:

Yaz has more RBI than Williams, it's a push though.

im not knocking yaz at all, but i guarantee if he has more RBI he did it over a longer period of time

williams is arguably the greatest hitter of all time, PERIOD

GREATEST

Yaz isnt even close to top 10, top 5 redsox all time? sure

[SmithsAUFan]

He said 'some categories'.

well they sure as hell arent batting average home runs or rbis :lol:

Yaz has more RBI than Williams, it's a push though.

im not knocking yaz at all, but i guarantee if he has more RBI he did it over a longer period of time

williams is arguably the greatest hitter of all time, PERIOD

GREATEST

Yaz isnt even close to top 10, top 5 redsox all time? sure

Ty Cobb would love to have a word with you in regards to Ted Williams.
This discussion is about better player and not hitter.
Ted Williams maybe a Top 3 hitter of all time but he was horrendous in the field.
Ted Williams might have been giving up as many runs as he was scoring.

The DH was not in baseball until 1973, I think.