Moderator: JdPat04




Citronauts_Knights wrote:If the bottom half of the ACC was traded with the top half of the AAC, the ACC would be a much better conference.

Muck FcDisney wrote:Citronauts_Knights wrote:If the bottom half of the ACC was traded with the top half of the AAC, the ACC would be a much better conference.
There's too much fluctuation in the AAC, IMO.
3 years (or less) from now UCF-Cincy and Memphis-SMU could switch records. Just depends on which rising star coaches are at which stepping stone program in a given year.

Citronauts_Knights wrote:Muck FcDisney wrote:Citronauts_Knights wrote:If the bottom half of the ACC was traded with the top half of the AAC, the ACC would be a much better conference.
There's too much fluctuation in the AAC, IMO.
3 years (or less) from now UCF-Cincy and Memphis-SMU could switch records. Just depends on which rising star coaches are at which stepping stone program in a given year.
I think if you take UCF, USF, Houston, Cincy, Memphis, and Navy, those would be a solid replacement for the bottom 6 ACC teams.
Especially once those teams are able to recruit as P5 teams and get P5 money each year.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 104 guests