One was...............................................Who gives a fuck?

:roasted

1 is relevant and the other is not you fucking retard.

1 just happened 2 years ago and was an identical scenario to this year with Ohio State and Alabama.

CraigKressel wrote:the only relevant information is any information that benefits my argument

OK

FSUKW wrote:

CraigKressel wrote:the only relevant information is any information that benefits my argument

OK

Are you that much of an asshole that you can't even look at this comparison or what? Is there something wrong with you?

It is a 100 percent legit comparison, are you 100 percent satisfied with how CFB operates because I personally think it needs a ton of improvements and this is a great example of why. Why is the committee contradicting literally the same exact scenario from 2 years ago. It is as close as you can get to Ohio State vs Alabama debate and it already happened 2 years ago just no one remembered it because it was 5 and 6 not 4 and 5.

Ohio State
http://www.espn.com/college-football/te ... /year/2015

Stanford
http://www.espn.com/college-football/te ... /year/2015

Losing 16-6 to what turned out to be a crap NW team and mediocre Oregon team is every bit as bad as losing by 31 to Iowa and OU

I agree but last year was a huge injustice as well.

BTW - your AD is on the committee.

FSUKW wrote:I agree but last year was a huge injustice as well.

BTW - your AD is on the committee.

He isnt allowed to do anything if ohio state is in the running practically. so big deal.

Last year was not an injustice think about it, the conference championship system is garbage, why was Wisconsin playing in that game instead of OSU

CraigKressel wrote:Last year was not an injustice think about it, the conference championship system is garbage, why was Wisconsin playing in that game instead of OSU

:biglol

Why was ohsu playing and not Iowa