I will go with

1. Clemson vs 4. Alabama
2. Oklahoma vs 3. Georgia

The redneck committee loves Alabama.

Sadly

1 Oklahoma vs 4 Bama
2 Clemson vs 3 Georgia

Dude you are already wrong about 1 thing that is easy to guess. Clemson will obviously be 1, why would Oklahoma jump them after that if the committee already had them behind them.

If this was Clemson instead of Ohio State they would spot Ohio State 30 points in this game because of Barrett's knee like they did Clemson for Kelly Bryant's ankle.

Ohio State 57 Wisconsin 21

CraigKressel wrote:Dude you are already wrong about 1 thing that is easy to guess. Clemson will obviously be 1, why would Oklahoma jump them after that if the committee already had them behind them.

Bama Clemsuck pt. 3 = $$$$$$$$

Carr2Cooper wrote:

CraigKressel wrote:Dude you are already wrong about 1 thing that is easy to guess. Clemson will obviously be 1, why would Oklahoma jump them after that if the committee already had them behind them.

Bama Clemsuck pt. 3 = $$$$$$$$

They know Bama will get the shit knocked out of them by Oklahoma, they can do Bama vs Clemson part 3 by putting them 1 and 4.

Oklahoma would beat Alabama by 20 right now, Hurts and their passing game pretty much sucks, the running game is solid but nothing special, and their defensive backend is pretty average. Oklahoma would pass all over them.

1 2 3 are a lock, the real question is 4 is it Ohio State or Alabama.

If they were smart they put Ohio State 4, Auburn 5, Alabama 6 so it didn't look as controversial. And they could just say that Auburn just whipped Alabama on the field but Ohio State has a better resume than Auburn by winning the conference so that is why they ranked them in that order.

1. Clemson vs. 4. Alabama
2. Oklahoma vs 3. Georgia

Georgia vs Alabama

Georgia National Champions

:bolt

Both SEC teams get blown out. Alabama and Georgia.

CraigKressel wrote:1 2 3 are a lock, the real question is 4 is it Ohio State or Alabama.

If they were smart they put Ohio State 4, Auburn 5, Alabama 6 so it didn't look as controversial. And they could just say that Auburn just whipped Alabama on the field but Ohio State has a better resume than Auburn by winning the conference so that is why they ranked them in that order.

:biglol


Put a 3 loss auburn in front of a 1 loss Bama...

Might as well put LSU #5 Auburn #6 and Bama #7

JdPat04 wrote:

CraigKressel wrote:1 2 3 are a lock, the real question is 4 is it Ohio State or Alabama.

If they were smart they put Ohio State 4, Auburn 5, Alabama 6 so it didn't look as controversial. And they could just say that Auburn just whipped Alabama on the field but Ohio State has a better resume than Auburn by winning the conference so that is why they ranked them in that order.

:biglol


Put a 3 loss auburn in front of a 1 loss Bama...

Might as well put LSU #5 Auburn #6 and Bama #7

12 game schedule they were 10-2 Alabama was 11-1. With a head to head ass kicking not to mention playing 2 teams that could very well beat Alabama Georgia and Clemson while Alabama played no one comparable, why in the hell would you punish Auburn for earning an extra game vs a top flight Georgia team?

JDpat why would you rank the SEC west champion behind an SEC west loser? Makes absolutely no sense right??

Ass kicking... :biglol

What do you call your two games with OU and Iowa?

:ROFL2

CraigKressel wrote:JDpat why would you rank the SEC west champion behind an SEC west loser? Makes absolutely no sense right??

Div champ can be 8-4 or 7-5 but sure they should be ranked ahead of a 1 loss team. :lolthumb

They would would have more than 1 loss then, quit making up retarded scenarios that cant even happen.

The reality is in a 12 game schedule that was harder, Auburn performed better than Alabama and won head to head. They played a 13th bonus game for OUTPERFORMING Alabama in the SEC west. That game should not count when comparing them to divison losers like Alabama

JdPat04 wrote:

CraigKressel wrote:JDpat why would you rank the SEC west champion behind an SEC west loser? Makes absolutely no sense right??

Div champ can be 8-4 or 7-5 but sure they should be ranked ahead of a 1 loss team. :lolthumb

How many FBS Power 5 opponents did Auburn and Ohio State play?

Ohio State played 11, Alabama played 9, Auburn played 10

Top 25 teams

Ohio State played 3
Alabama played 2
Auburn played 6

Top 10 teams
Ohio State played 2
Alabama 0
Auburn played 4

Maybe this is why Alabama only has 1 losses because they haven't played anyone, both teams should be ranked ahead of Alabummer

CraigKressel wrote:They would would have more than 1 loss then, quit making up retarded scenarios that cant even happen.

The reality is in a 12 game schedule that was harder, Auburn performed better than Alabama and won head to head. They played a 13th bonus game for OUTPERFORMING Alabama in the SEC west. That game should not count when comparing them to divison losers like Alabama

Who would?

You're retarded

Auburn could've lost 4 OOC games and to LSU or even Arkansas not even LSU and then beat Bama and went 7-5 and been the div champs.


Shut the fuck like you know something

CraigKressel wrote:

JdPat04 wrote:

CraigKressel wrote:JDpat why would you rank the SEC west champion behind an SEC west loser? Makes absolutely no sense right??

Div champ can be 8-4 or 7-5 but sure they should be ranked ahead of a 1 loss team. :lolthumb

How many FBS Power 5 opponents did Auburn and Ohio State play?

Ohio State played 11, Alabama played 9, Auburn played 10

Top 25 teams

Ohio State played 3
Alabama played 2
Auburn played 6

Top 10 teams
Ohio State played 2
Alabama 0
Auburn played 4

Maybe this is why Alabama only has 1 losses because they haven't played anyone, both teams should be ranked ahead of Alabummer

7-5 Iowa 31 point loss :roasted

Exactly my point though, if we had played Mercer instead we would be sitting pretty. Could have played FSU instead of OU too and we would be undefeated.

Nobody is going 0-4 OOC and winning a power 5 conference hell in the SEC you guys don't even play 4 real OOC teams and they are always home games for the most part. It is mandatory if you are in the SEC you have to play 1 team that it is a 99.99 percent chance of winning because the other team sucks so bad.

None of the other Power 5 conferences are chickenshit enough to only play 8 conference games.