Moderator: JdPat04

mrfree wrote:Yeah they were alot of missed calls. Ppl were pissed



bigbluebazooka wrote:mrfree wrote:It was a fun game to attend even with the result. Defense was not prepared and the achilles heel was our qb. Team just choked at the end of season. #babysteps. This team was irrelevant for the last decade so its a Nice second step in the big picture.
Wisconsin is very disciplined and that oline looked like a nfl oline. I was wrong on the big ten. They dont play fast but they will play physical. Wisconsin fans are cool as Hell btw.
10/10 experiance for me
Congrats to the shitty SEC refs. :down

CraigKressel wrote:bigbluebazooka wrote:mrfree wrote:It was a fun game to attend even with the result. Defense was not prepared and the achilles heel was our qb. Team just choked at the end of season. #babysteps. This team was irrelevant for the last decade so its a Nice second step in the big picture.
Wisconsin is very disciplined and that oline looked like a nfl oline. I was wrong on the big ten. They dont play fast but they will play physical. Wisconsin fans are cool as Hell btw.
10/10 experiance for me
Congrats to the shitty SEC refs. :down
http://caneswatch.blog.palmbeachpost.co ... dl-heated/

bigbluebazooka wrote:CraigKressel wrote:bigbluebazooka wrote:mrfree wrote:It was a fun game to attend even with the result. Defense was not prepared and the achilles heel was our qb. Team just choked at the end of season. #babysteps. This team was irrelevant for the last decade so its a Nice second step in the big picture.
Wisconsin is very disciplined and that oline looked like a nfl oline. I was wrong on the big ten. They dont play fast but they will play physical. Wisconsin fans are cool as Hell btw.
10/10 experiance for me
Congrats to the shitty SEC refs. :down
http://caneswatch.blog.palmbeachpost.co ... dl-heated/


CraigKressel wrote:FSUKW wrote:CraigKressel wrote:Wisconsin something like 24 to 10
Based on what?
I hate Miami but every post you make, drips with bias.
Wisconsin literally played nobody. Just because they destroyed the team that destroyed you does not make them a good team.
Who is biased now? Game pretty much was a higher scoring version of my prediction.

FSUKW wrote:CraigKressel wrote:FSUKW wrote:CraigKressel wrote:Wisconsin something like 24 to 10
Based on what?
I hate Miami but every post you make, drips with bias.
Wisconsin literally played nobody. Just because they destroyed the team that destroyed you does not make them a good team.
Who is biased now? Game pretty much was a higher scoring version of my prediction.
It was a pretty evenly matched game. Only difference was 3 INT's and 2 missed FG by Miami. Only one of those INT's was on the defense (the white DE) the other two were tips. You made a good call, but it wasn't some strategic effort. Officiating was horrible on both sides.

CraigKressel wrote:FSUKW wrote:CraigKressel wrote:FSUKW wrote:CraigKressel wrote:Wisconsin something like 24 to 10
Based on what?
I hate Miami but every post you make, drips with bias.
Wisconsin literally played nobody. Just because they destroyed the team that destroyed you does not make them a good team.
Who is biased now? Game pretty much was a higher scoring version of my prediction.
It was a pretty evenly matched game. Only difference was 3 INT's and 2 missed FG by Miami. Only one of those INT's was on the defense (the white DE) the other two were tips. You made a good call, but it wasn't some strategic effort. Officiating was horrible on both sides.
What do you mean it wasn't strategic, I explained why I had Wisconsin by 14. THE ACC IS FUCKING HORRIBLE this year period and Miami struggled in almost every game they are like an 8-5 team that got a couple lucky breaks. I think it was pretty obvious what was going to happen. Their QB is shitty, their running game isn't great and their defense is good but nothing special.

FSUKW wrote:CraigKressel wrote:FSUKW wrote:CraigKressel wrote:FSUKW wrote:CraigKressel wrote:Wisconsin something like 24 to 10
Based on what?
I hate Miami but every post you make, drips with bias.
Wisconsin literally played nobody. Just because they destroyed the team that destroyed you does not make them a good team.
Who is biased now? Game pretty much was a higher scoring version of my prediction.
It was a pretty evenly matched game. Only difference was 3 INT's and 2 missed FG by Miami. Only one of those INT's was on the defense (the white DE) the other two were tips. You made a good call, but it wasn't some strategic effort. Officiating was horrible on both sides.
What do you mean it wasn't strategic, I explained why I had Wisconsin by 14. THE ACC IS FUCKING HORRIBLE this year period and Miami struggled in almost every game they are like an 8-5 team that got a couple lucky breaks. I think it was pretty obvious what was going to happen. Their QB is shitty, their running game isn't great and their defense is good but nothing special.
If they make their two FG's its a 1 point game. Look at the Box score. Pretty fucking even. This was always going to be a coin toss. You got lucky. ACC play is meaningless in your argument. Big 10 is not some power house conference.
https://www.masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm

CraigKressel wrote:FSUKW wrote:CraigKressel wrote:FSUKW wrote:CraigKressel wrote:FSUKW wrote:CraigKressel wrote:Wisconsin something like 24 to 10
Based on what?
I hate Miami but every post you make, drips with bias.
Wisconsin literally played nobody. Just because they destroyed the team that destroyed you does not make them a good team.
Who is biased now? Game pretty much was a higher scoring version of my prediction.
It was a pretty evenly matched game. Only difference was 3 INT's and 2 missed FG by Miami. Only one of those INT's was on the defense (the white DE) the other two were tips. You made a good call, but it wasn't some strategic effort. Officiating was horrible on both sides.
What do you mean it wasn't strategic, I explained why I had Wisconsin by 14. THE ACC IS FUCKING HORRIBLE this year period and Miami struggled in almost every game they are like an 8-5 team that got a couple lucky breaks. I think it was pretty obvious what was going to happen. Their QB is shitty, their running game isn't great and their defense is good but nothing special.
If they make their two FG's its a 1 point game. Look at the Box score. Pretty fucking even. This was always going to be a coin toss. You got lucky. ACC play is meaningless in your argument. Big 10 is not some power house conference.
https://www.masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm
Out gained by 30 yards and had 2 more turnovers, looks like a solid victory indicative of the score to me. The Big 10 is a powerhouse conference right now. Just look at it compared to the ACC.
Lets go further out how would NC State and VT fair vs PSU and Michigan State? They would get their asses handed to them.



CraigKressel wrote:When are INTs indicative of yards if anything it makes the other team get less yards because of a short field or pick 6s doofus.

NiggerDick wrote:Its all good. Despite what people want to believe Miami is trending upwards as a program while we have in state rivals who aren't trending at all. :lolthumb


FSUKW wrote:CraigKressel wrote:When are INTs indicative of yards if anything it makes the other team get less yards because of a short field or pick 6s doofus.
Point is 23 yards is minimal as "outgaining" goes. Especially when you had the ball 19 minutes longer TOP - which is indicative of the turnovers.

FSUKW wrote:In your biased opinion. Don't use PSU, they have played nobody. They beat their bowl opponent - who played nobody. PAC 10 sucks as usual.
Out gained by 23 yards, after 3 INT. LOL

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 104 guests