Wisconsin vs Miami

Dedicated to Nathan, a badass little Duck!

Moderator: JdPat04

Re: Wisconsin vs Miami

Postby mrfree » December 31st, 2017, 1:28 pm

Yeah they were alot of missed calls. Ppl were pissed
mrfree
 
Posts: 22182
Joined: January 14th, 2010, 5:48 am
Team Logo:
Miami Hurricanes
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 105 times

Re: Wisconsin vs Miami

Postby bigbluebazooka » December 31st, 2017, 1:43 pm

mrfree wrote:Yeah they were alot of missed calls. Ppl were pissed

Ill just be glad if i never see Rosier play QB for us again. :up

And again fuck the SEC refs and LOL at the Criminoles and gatas on their shitty season. :lolthumb

And fuck Notre Dame also.
bigbluebazooka
 
Posts: 9087
Joined: August 25th, 2013, 1:18 am
Team Logo:
Miami Hurricanes
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 335 times

Re: Wisconsin vs Miami

Postby Carr2Cooper » December 31st, 2017, 1:49 pm

They misses a lot of calls on Miami...that clear as day hold on the wildcat TD....the fact Miami's OT had his arm wrapped around Wisconsin DE's neck.
Carr2Cooper
 
Posts: 50510
Joined: January 29th, 2009, 11:37 pm
Location: The year 2505
Team Logo:
South Alabama Jaguars
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 174 times

Re: Wisconsin vs Miami

Postby JdPat04 » December 31st, 2017, 3:38 pm

Sec refs should've ejected Richt
JdPat04
 
Posts: 76947
Joined: February 12th, 2008, 3:52 am
Team Logo:
Alabama Crimson Tide
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 361 times

Re: Wisconsin vs Miami

Postby CraigKressel » December 31st, 2017, 4:03 pm

bigbluebazooka wrote:
mrfree wrote:It was a fun game to attend even with the result. Defense was not prepared and the achilles heel was our qb. Team just choked at the end of season. #babysteps. This team was irrelevant for the last decade so its a Nice second step in the big picture.

Wisconsin is very disciplined and that oline looked like a nfl oline. I was wrong on the big ten. They dont play fast but they will play physical. Wisconsin fans are cool as Hell btw.

10/10 experiance for me


Congrats to the shitty SEC refs. :down




http://caneswatch.blog.palmbeachpost.co ... dl-heated/



That first 1 where is the hold didn't really see anything. The 2nd 1 that grab was pretty quick and did not effect the receiver in any way but probably could have been called.
CraigKressel
 
Posts: 8330
Joined: November 8th, 2013, 4:15 pm
Team Logo:
Ohio St Buckeyes
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 226 times

Re: Wisconsin vs Miami

Postby bigbluebazooka » December 31st, 2017, 4:07 pm

CraigKressel wrote:
bigbluebazooka wrote:
mrfree wrote:It was a fun game to attend even with the result. Defense was not prepared and the achilles heel was our qb. Team just choked at the end of season. #babysteps. This team was irrelevant for the last decade so its a Nice second step in the big picture.

Wisconsin is very disciplined and that oline looked like a nfl oline. I was wrong on the big ten. They dont play fast but they will play physical. Wisconsin fans are cool as Hell btw.

10/10 experiance for me


Congrats to the shitty SEC refs. :down




http://caneswatch.blog.palmbeachpost.co ... dl-heated/



That first 1 where is the hold didn't really see anything. The 2nd 1 that grab was pretty quick and did not effect the receiver in any way but probably could have been called.

Hold on RT led to a key 3rd down conversion.

Hold on wr led to an int.

Its all good. Despite what people want to believe Miami is trending upwards as a program while we have in state rivals who aren't trending at all. :lolthumb
bigbluebazooka
 
Posts: 9087
Joined: August 25th, 2013, 1:18 am
Team Logo:
Miami Hurricanes
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 335 times

Re: Wisconsin vs Miami

Postby CraigKressel » December 31st, 2017, 4:19 pm

bigbluebazooka wrote:
CraigKressel wrote:
bigbluebazooka wrote:
mrfree wrote:It was a fun game to attend even with the result. Defense was not prepared and the achilles heel was our qb. Team just choked at the end of season. #babysteps. This team was irrelevant for the last decade so its a Nice second step in the big picture.

Wisconsin is very disciplined and that oline looked like a nfl oline. I was wrong on the big ten. They dont play fast but they will play physical. Wisconsin fans are cool as Hell btw.

10/10 experiance for me


Congrats to the shitty SEC refs. :down




http://caneswatch.blog.palmbeachpost.co ... dl-heated/



That first 1 where is the hold didn't really see anything. The 2nd 1 that grab was pretty quick and did not effect the receiver in any way but probably could have been called.

Hold on RT led to a key 3rd down conversion.

Hold on wr led to an int.

Its all good. Despite what people want to believe Miami is trending upwards as a program while we have in state rivals who aren't trending at all. :lolthumb


What about the fumble at the beginning of the game, he clearly still had a grip on the ball when his elbow was down the ball wasn't out or loose it did move in position from where it was but there was no space between his hand, arm and the ball.
CraigKressel
 
Posts: 8330
Joined: November 8th, 2013, 4:15 pm
Team Logo:
Ohio St Buckeyes
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 226 times

Re: Wisconsin vs Miami

Postby FSUKW » December 31st, 2017, 4:24 pm

Refs gifted you a fumble. I know you were watching it on tv, so you saw the replays. You guys jumped off sides on a holding call on Wisconsin.

As for this gem of stupidity "while we have in state rivals who aren't trending at all" you clearly do not watch football. We are not Miami.

It is funny, you can't beat us when we are good. Guess what, we will be good again in 8 short months.

Enjoy that Richt 10 win ceiling. Miami scares nobody.... :ROFL2
FSUKW
 
Posts: 28049
Joined: February 3rd, 2009, 8:07 pm
Team Logo:
Florida St Seminols
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 398 times

Re: Wisconsin vs Miami

Postby FSUKW » December 31st, 2017, 4:29 pm

CraigKressel wrote:
FSUKW wrote:
CraigKressel wrote:Wisconsin something like 24 to 10


Based on what?

I hate Miami but every post you make, drips with bias.

Wisconsin literally played nobody. Just because they destroyed the team that destroyed you does not make them a good team.


Who is biased now? Game pretty much was a higher scoring version of my prediction.


It was a pretty evenly matched game. Only difference was 3 INT's and 2 missed FG by Miami. Only one of those INT's was on the defense (the white DE) the other two were tips. You made a good call, but it wasn't some strategic effort. Officiating was horrible on both sides.
FSUKW
 
Posts: 28049
Joined: February 3rd, 2009, 8:07 pm
Team Logo:
Florida St Seminols
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 398 times

Re: Wisconsin vs Miami

Postby CraigKressel » December 31st, 2017, 4:35 pm

FSUKW wrote:
CraigKressel wrote:
FSUKW wrote:
CraigKressel wrote:Wisconsin something like 24 to 10


Based on what?

I hate Miami but every post you make, drips with bias.

Wisconsin literally played nobody. Just because they destroyed the team that destroyed you does not make them a good team.


Who is biased now? Game pretty much was a higher scoring version of my prediction.


It was a pretty evenly matched game. Only difference was 3 INT's and 2 missed FG by Miami. Only one of those INT's was on the defense (the white DE) the other two were tips. You made a good call, but it wasn't some strategic effort. Officiating was horrible on both sides.


What do you mean it wasn't strategic, I explained why I had Wisconsin by 14. THE ACC IS FUCKING HORRIBLE this year period and Miami struggled in almost every game they are like an 8-5 team that got a couple lucky breaks. I think it was pretty obvious what was going to happen. Their QB is shitty, their running game isn't great and their defense is good but nothing special.
CraigKressel
 
Posts: 8330
Joined: November 8th, 2013, 4:15 pm
Team Logo:
Ohio St Buckeyes
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 226 times

Re: Wisconsin vs Miami

Postby FSUKW » December 31st, 2017, 4:42 pm

CraigKressel wrote:
FSUKW wrote:
CraigKressel wrote:
FSUKW wrote:
CraigKressel wrote:Wisconsin something like 24 to 10


Based on what?

I hate Miami but every post you make, drips with bias.

Wisconsin literally played nobody. Just because they destroyed the team that destroyed you does not make them a good team.


Who is biased now? Game pretty much was a higher scoring version of my prediction.


It was a pretty evenly matched game. Only difference was 3 INT's and 2 missed FG by Miami. Only one of those INT's was on the defense (the white DE) the other two were tips. You made a good call, but it wasn't some strategic effort. Officiating was horrible on both sides.


What do you mean it wasn't strategic, I explained why I had Wisconsin by 14. THE ACC IS FUCKING HORRIBLE this year period and Miami struggled in almost every game they are like an 8-5 team that got a couple lucky breaks. I think it was pretty obvious what was going to happen. Their QB is shitty, their running game isn't great and their defense is good but nothing special.


If they make their two FG's its a 1 point game. Look at the Box score. Pretty fucking even. This was always going to be a coin toss. You got lucky. ACC play is meaningless in your argument. Big 10 is not some power house conference.

https://www.masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm
FSUKW
 
Posts: 28049
Joined: February 3rd, 2009, 8:07 pm
Team Logo:
Florida St Seminols
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 398 times

Re: Wisconsin vs Miami

Postby CraigKressel » December 31st, 2017, 4:55 pm

FSUKW wrote:
CraigKressel wrote:
FSUKW wrote:
CraigKressel wrote:
FSUKW wrote:
CraigKressel wrote:Wisconsin something like 24 to 10


Based on what?

I hate Miami but every post you make, drips with bias.

Wisconsin literally played nobody. Just because they destroyed the team that destroyed you does not make them a good team.


Who is biased now? Game pretty much was a higher scoring version of my prediction.


It was a pretty evenly matched game. Only difference was 3 INT's and 2 missed FG by Miami. Only one of those INT's was on the defense (the white DE) the other two were tips. You made a good call, but it wasn't some strategic effort. Officiating was horrible on both sides.


What do you mean it wasn't strategic, I explained why I had Wisconsin by 14. THE ACC IS FUCKING HORRIBLE this year period and Miami struggled in almost every game they are like an 8-5 team that got a couple lucky breaks. I think it was pretty obvious what was going to happen. Their QB is shitty, their running game isn't great and their defense is good but nothing special.


If they make their two FG's its a 1 point game. Look at the Box score. Pretty fucking even. This was always going to be a coin toss. You got lucky. ACC play is meaningless in your argument. Big 10 is not some power house conference.

https://www.masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm


Out gained by 30 yards and had 2 more turnovers, looks like a solid victory indicative of the score to me. The Big 10 is a powerhouse conference right now. Just look at it compared to the ACC.

Lets go further out how would NC State and VT fair vs PSU and Michigan State? They would get their asses handed to them.
CraigKressel
 
Posts: 8330
Joined: November 8th, 2013, 4:15 pm
Team Logo:
Ohio St Buckeyes
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 226 times

Re: Wisconsin vs Miami

Postby FSUKW » December 31st, 2017, 5:10 pm

CraigKressel wrote:
FSUKW wrote:
CraigKressel wrote:
FSUKW wrote:
CraigKressel wrote:
FSUKW wrote:
CraigKressel wrote:Wisconsin something like 24 to 10


Based on what?

I hate Miami but every post you make, drips with bias.

Wisconsin literally played nobody. Just because they destroyed the team that destroyed you does not make them a good team.


Who is biased now? Game pretty much was a higher scoring version of my prediction.


It was a pretty evenly matched game. Only difference was 3 INT's and 2 missed FG by Miami. Only one of those INT's was on the defense (the white DE) the other two were tips. You made a good call, but it wasn't some strategic effort. Officiating was horrible on both sides.


What do you mean it wasn't strategic, I explained why I had Wisconsin by 14. THE ACC IS FUCKING HORRIBLE this year period and Miami struggled in almost every game they are like an 8-5 team that got a couple lucky breaks. I think it was pretty obvious what was going to happen. Their QB is shitty, their running game isn't great and their defense is good but nothing special.


If they make their two FG's its a 1 point game. Look at the Box score. Pretty fucking even. This was always going to be a coin toss. You got lucky. ACC play is meaningless in your argument. Big 10 is not some power house conference.

https://www.masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm


Out gained by 30 yards and had 2 more turnovers, looks like a solid victory indicative of the score to me. The Big 10 is a powerhouse conference right now. Just look at it compared to the ACC.

Lets go further out how would NC State and VT fair vs PSU and Michigan State? They would get their asses handed to them.


In your biased opinion. Don't use PSU, they have played nobody. They beat their bowl opponent - who played nobody. PAC 10 sucks as usual.

Out gained by 23 yards, after 3 INT. LOL
FSUKW
 
Posts: 28049
Joined: February 3rd, 2009, 8:07 pm
Team Logo:
Florida St Seminols
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 398 times

Re: Wisconsin vs Miami

Postby CraigKressel » December 31st, 2017, 5:26 pm

When are INTs indicative of yards if anything it makes the other team get less yards because of a short field or pick 6s doofus.
CraigKressel
 
Posts: 8330
Joined: November 8th, 2013, 4:15 pm
Team Logo:
Ohio St Buckeyes
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 226 times

Re: Wisconsin vs Miami

Postby ericberry14 » December 31st, 2017, 5:34 pm

Yeah when you force a bunch of turnovers and take a lead scoring on short fields it forces the other team to throw more and it’s not crazy to even see the winning team have less yards if it’s not an absolute blowout.
ericberry14
Site Admin
 
Posts: 41212
Joined: October 28th, 2008, 10:18 pm
Location: Memphis
Team Logo:
Ohio St Buckeyes
Has thanked: 455 times
Been thanked: 601 times

Re: Wisconsin vs Miami

Postby FSUKW » December 31st, 2017, 5:38 pm

CraigKressel wrote:When are INTs indicative of yards if anything it makes the other team get less yards because of a short field or pick 6s doofus.


Point is 23 yards is minimal as "outgaining" goes. Especially when you had the ball 19 minutes longer TOP - which is indicative of the turnovers.
FSUKW
 
Posts: 28049
Joined: February 3rd, 2009, 8:07 pm
Team Logo:
Florida St Seminols
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 398 times

Re: Wisconsin vs Miami

Postby FuckESPNdotCOM » December 31st, 2017, 5:53 pm

NiggerDick wrote:Its all good. Despite what people want to believe Miami is trending upwards as a program while we have in state rivals who aren't trending at all. :lolthumb

Denial stage still. :biglol The only place scUM is trending upwards is in the L column. :dog
Meanwhile even UF can win against crap teams at the end of the year. :ROFL
FuckESPNdotCOM
 
Posts: 11049
Joined: November 28th, 2012, 6:53 pm
Location: Vengeance
Team Logo:
Florida St Seminols
Has thanked: 145 times
Been thanked: 187 times

Re: Wisconsin vs Miami

Postby CraigKressel » December 31st, 2017, 7:48 pm

Miami still beat FSU and had a way better season and are probably going to be better again next year and for the foreseeable future so why are all these FSU fans talking shit?
CraigKressel
 
Posts: 8330
Joined: November 8th, 2013, 4:15 pm
Team Logo:
Ohio St Buckeyes
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 226 times

Re: Wisconsin vs Miami

Postby CraigKressel » December 31st, 2017, 7:52 pm

FSUKW wrote:
CraigKressel wrote:When are INTs indicative of yards if anything it makes the other team get less yards because of a short field or pick 6s doofus.


Point is 23 yards is minimal as "outgaining" goes. Especially when you had the ball 19 minutes longer TOP - which is indicative of the turnovers.



If my team gets an INT and has a 20 yard TD drive my team only has 20 yards but 7 points.
If my team gets the ball punted to them at the 10 yardline, drive 40 yards my team has 40 yards and 0 points. Looks better on the stat sheet but not the score board.

If the opposing team has 3 turnovers and you outgained them by 30 yards it is probably a fairly convincing victory.

Just look at the stats from the Ohio State USC game for example, they didn't need to do much on offense because they had a short field the whole game and USC had a long field. A pick 6 basically gives the other team an extra possession as well.
CraigKressel
 
Posts: 8330
Joined: November 8th, 2013, 4:15 pm
Team Logo:
Ohio St Buckeyes
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 226 times

Re: Wisconsin vs Miami

Postby CraigKressel » December 31st, 2017, 7:59 pm

FSUKW wrote:In your biased opinion. Don't use PSU, they have played nobody. They beat their bowl opponent - who played nobody. PAC 10 sucks as usual.

Out gained by 23 yards, after 3 INT. LOL


To say Penn State did not play anyone is pretty fucking ridiculous.

Ohio State, Michigan State, Washington, NW that's 4 teams that will likely finish in the top 20 and 3 in the top 15. Yea they lost 2 of them but by a combined 4 points and really they whipped Washington but the score was closer than the actual game was. Michigan is a solid team too the main reason they looked bad is because the Big 10 east is challenging still finished 8-4 and probably will beat SC in the bowl game.

Washington played Stanford, Washington State and that great Fresno team that the committee ranked just to justify Alabama being in the playoff. Kind of weak schedule but they are a solid team that just made the playoff last year and returned much of the team.
CraigKressel
 
Posts: 8330
Joined: November 8th, 2013, 4:15 pm
Team Logo:
Ohio St Buckeyes
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 226 times

PreviousNext

Return to College Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 104 guests