Moderator: JdPat04




CraigKressel wrote:Dude you are already wrong about 1 thing that is easy to guess. Clemson will obviously be 1, why would Oklahoma jump them after that if the committee already had them behind them.

Carr2Cooper wrote:CraigKressel wrote:Dude you are already wrong about 1 thing that is easy to guess. Clemson will obviously be 1, why would Oklahoma jump them after that if the committee already had them behind them.
Bama Clemsuck pt. 3 = $$$$$$$$




CraigKressel wrote:1 2 3 are a lock, the real question is 4 is it Ohio State or Alabama.
If they were smart they put Ohio State 4, Auburn 5, Alabama 6 so it didn't look as controversial. And they could just say that Auburn just whipped Alabama on the field but Ohio State has a better resume than Auburn by winning the conference so that is why they ranked them in that order.

JdPat04 wrote:CraigKressel wrote:1 2 3 are a lock, the real question is 4 is it Ohio State or Alabama.
If they were smart they put Ohio State 4, Auburn 5, Alabama 6 so it didn't look as controversial. And they could just say that Auburn just whipped Alabama on the field but Ohio State has a better resume than Auburn by winning the conference so that is why they ranked them in that order.
:biglol
Put a 3 loss auburn in front of a 1 loss Bama...
Might as well put LSU #5 Auburn #6 and Bama #7



CraigKressel wrote:JDpat why would you rank the SEC west champion behind an SEC west loser? Makes absolutely no sense right??


JdPat04 wrote:CraigKressel wrote:JDpat why would you rank the SEC west champion behind an SEC west loser? Makes absolutely no sense right??
Div champ can be 8-4 or 7-5 but sure they should be ranked ahead of a 1 loss team. :lolthumb

CraigKressel wrote:They would would have more than 1 loss then, quit making up retarded scenarios that cant even happen.
The reality is in a 12 game schedule that was harder, Auburn performed better than Alabama and won head to head. They played a 13th bonus game for OUTPERFORMING Alabama in the SEC west. That game should not count when comparing them to divison losers like Alabama

CraigKressel wrote:JdPat04 wrote:CraigKressel wrote:JDpat why would you rank the SEC west champion behind an SEC west loser? Makes absolutely no sense right??
Div champ can be 8-4 or 7-5 but sure they should be ranked ahead of a 1 loss team. :lolthumb
How many FBS Power 5 opponents did Auburn and Ohio State play?
Ohio State played 11, Alabama played 9, Auburn played 10
Top 25 teams
Ohio State played 3
Alabama played 2
Auburn played 6
Top 10 teams
Ohio State played 2
Alabama 0
Auburn played 4
Maybe this is why Alabama only has 1 losses because they haven't played anyone, both teams should be ranked ahead of Alabummer



Users browsing this forum: BUCKEYEWILLY34 and 68 guests